Ive shot numerous rolls of this film to test repairs Ive made to my cameras, but not very many on what Id consider serious work. Warum hast den denn den Agfa Kipp verwendet, denn es ist ja vermutlich ein Ilford Film. Is that the new Jane Bond? Its cheaper than tri-x and hp5+. Your link has been automatically embedded. I think that overexposed by a stop it definitely shares characteristics, there is some equivalency between the rendering of the grain, and the achievable contrast in flat light. These films are reasonably similarly priced, at around 25 for a pack of 5x 36-shot rolls at time of writing. Ive shot Tri-X before, but my preference is HP5+! You write from your shoes on the groundand no tree shots. by visiting our affiliates! To learn more, check-out the About page, or read News for the latest. Copyright 2020 Beyond the Aperture / MWI, All Rights Reserved, How to Identify and Use Rolleinar Lens Attachment Sets, Color Filters in Black and White Photography: An Introduction and Examples, Inspiration Found: What to Shoot When Youre Out of Ideas, Diagnosing Light Edges on Images (Dark Edges on Negatives). Ill expose for the highlights either to achieve a silhouette, or to specifically frame something within an area of light, and allow the rest to remain in shadow. Learn how your comment data is processed. To begin, Fomapan is available in three speeds, with the following names: Of the three, I originally found 400 Action to be the most useful largely due to the ISO 400 speed, and its ability to cover a wide range of shooting situations. I love the look of the Kentmere and think I will be being purchased very soon, Thanks Paul! und deshalb folge ich da den Herstellerangaben der Chemie. Ansel Adams did good tree work. The experiment started by shooting a roll of Kentmere 400 and a roll of Fomapan 400. I want to ask a question about developer; What kind of developer was used? But dont limit yourself to those; it also sings in Kodak D-23. The high contrast results really lent a wonderful aesthetic to those images, and Im glad I didnt choose to take Kentmere. Simon, nice job! 1. Yes, in that case you would be cutting into the film speed a bit, but you could still get more of the look you like while shooting the film you prefer. Thank you Daniel! Kentmere is the easier and faster film, i have been able to get as good results as HP5+, and i somehow have this feel that the grain is smaller or less visible, may be completely objectively wrong. I no longer have to cross my fingers hoping that the negatives will come out. Ich wrde einen HP5 nehmen und unter 20C bleiben. Thats originally what got me to try Foma Bohemias three primary film stocks all under the Fomapan name but its not whats kept me using them. Id say that Fomapan 400 is fairly low grain, but largegrained very visible, but not bad to my eye. 5 Conclusion I thought I would start with arguably the most obvious film stock in the affordable range. I recommend having a look at the images found in those to assess the qualities to be found at each different methodology. 2. The Minolta Maxxum 9 The Perfect Professional 35mm SLR? You must log in or register to reply here. Because Fomapan is a classic, old-school type of emulsion, its performance in 135 format is what youd more or less expect when shot in the much smaller frame size of 35mm film, which in a word, a bit grainy. I cant find a reputable source to this, and theres nothing mentioned in Fomas technical sheets, so Im really not sure what to think about this. The Pen EE has not arrived yet.. Its siblings include Fomapan 100 and Fomapan 200, plus a Retropan 320 film that was introduced just a few years ago. Im still not sure about Kentmere 400. Glad you found it useful! I'm open to any dispute. (meine Frau sagt ja, das sei alles nur Voodoo und dass man das mit dem Kippen auch getrost bleiben lassen oder komplett bertreiben kann. Theres any number of things I could try. If I could only have one it would be the Ilford for its bulletproof reliability. Everything is personal preference, just All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. Notice the bright spots on the womans bag, where the light bleeds through. A lovely aesthetic, but definitely one to be controlled rather than allowed to get out of hand. These images show how much information is available in these highlights when metered and exposed dead-on, as well as what detail is retained within the shadows and what is lost. Update: December 30, 2020While keeping the original pricing at the time of writing in-place, added prices as of December 2020. I In terms of whatspossible to create between these two films then the look of Fomapan as a 200 speed film wins for me. Clocking in at $5.19 a roll for 36 exposures as of October 2021, this is the lest expensive film I shot for this comparison. Kentmere seems to be accurately rated at 400, and Ive never been inclined to shoot it over/under, or even to push or pull it. Trees dont move. Notice the lost detail in both the figure and the highlight of the water. Corrected a couple of typos in the original piece. I bought Arista edu 400 for it's infrared capability. Noticeable halation. Thank you! Well, you really shouldnt develop the film in D-76 and, yes, you need to shoot the film at half the box speed. und es hat irgendwie immer gepasst. It also dries flat so picking it up is a little trickier. Having now revisited it with my more advanced skillset Im happy with the look it can offer, and have a better []. Most of my serious stuff I would not use 35mm for. Deine Erfahrungen beziehen sich vermutlich auf den neuen APX 400. Kentmere 400, metered for the mid-tone. Fomapan 400, metered for the wall on the right. First, a quick bit about the technical specs behind this comparison. Unless you really zoom in on the scans I think that the Nikon lenses I shot these images on delivered excellent results, and the film drew that sharpness without adding too much character. The question isn't "is HP5 $20 better than Foma", but rather "do I value my work to the tune of $20". An update here. Black and rich and whites are vivid. However I think because of the grain structure I often perceive the Fomapan to have a little bit of an edge in sharpness. Give good old Kodak Tri-X a workout. It is a bit of a marmite film that gives some very different results depending on the use case. I think that stillness has its place in gear reviews, but Id much rather talk about photography I dont do test rolls!Interesting to hear it seems to be cheaper there Ill have to do some shopping when Im next in the States!Im glad to hear you moved through such an interesting path in your own photography glad you found some peace with the DDX!Happy shooting! I got on my high horse and wrote an email to Foma to complain. The character of these films comes down to a combination of the above factors. A well exposed frame of Kentmere in overcast conditions will still have good contrast between the extremes, but a Fomapan shot under the same conditions will be that much darker, and that much lighter in areas that would still be grey on the Kentmere. sie hatte nicht ganz unrecht. If you want some quality on iso 1600 with a iso 400 film use the HP5+ or films like delta 3200 or Tmax 3200 on iso 1600. das wird 60er Schleifpapier mit viel Charakter aber ohne Grauwerte. All I know is I was researching cheap 100 rolls and came upon this link. These days Im only really developing my own film when I have certain requirements, like push processing, otherwise I wait until I have a large batch to send off to AG in Birmingham. HP5+ is an exemplary film, and definitely worth the extra cost. I want to see what a film or lens does on the street or around people. I guess that having used it for so long is also a factor, but I have a lot of confidence in Kentmere 400. Compare Foma Fomapan 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Ilford HP5 Plus vs FUJIFILM Superia X-TRA 400 Press ? Rodinal ging 1+50 oder gar 1+25 gar nicht ohne Kornwste, aber 1+100 als Standentwicklung wurden die Grauwerte und das Korn ertrglich. When it comes to Fomapan film, results and opinions are mixed. Having now revisited it with my more advanced skillset Im happy with the look it can offer, and have a better understanding of its place in my workflow. https://emulsive.org/reviews/film-review-fomapan-400-arista-edu-ultra-400, https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/7822-REG/B_W_65072240_39mm_Infrared_Dark_Red.html, https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/23077-REG/Hoya_B55RM72_55mm_R72_Infrared_Glass.html. einmal hat sie es geschafft, mich vom Kippen abzuhalten und der Film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr. Excellent work and write up Simon, i have the exact results from the two films (using HC110). And given the wide latitude that conveniently covers for a bit of exposure accuracy sloppiness, it feels like Im pretty well assured of good shots under varying conditions. My experiences with both of these films has been through sharp lenses Leica, Zeiss, Nikon, some of the most reputable lenses for sharpness every produced. Ive found that when scanning, especially if youre using something like an Epson V600, it can be very difficult to recover highlights from Tri-X without throwing off the whole image. Now that Im retired, I like instant gratification slip into the darkroom whenever I need to process filmpour, dilute, temp check, time/temp compensate and process. Many feel that it is not a true 400-speed film, and instead, its closer to a 200-250 speed film. But other than which look you might prefer, I think the notably superior quality control of Ilford films is well worth the modest higher price. Enter ? ? I developed both films with rodinol, so a good deal of grain was to be expected. I loaded up my LowePro 400 AW II with my Nikon F100, 12-24mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.8, and 85mm f/1.8 one foggy March morning before striking out through the streets of NYC to shoot some film. My previous pushing experiences with 400 speed films is with Tri-X and HP5+, both well known for their excellent latitude. Fomapan 400, metered for the batons. Grundstzlich passt auch jetzt alles in den Schrank, doch ordentlich ist das nicht. The Kentmere almost never dips into pure white, whereas the Fomapan does so very frequently. Dies betrifft sowohl die Chemieflaschen als auch Papiere. Fomapan 400 can also be used for street work in dull conditions or in areas where you want to show off a bit more crunch to go with urban decay. Fomapan 400, exposed for the sky behind the drivers cab. There is no longer that very obvious and annoying halation or muddiness in the prints. Was ich nun suche ist ein Film der bei 400/24 oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert. For your last two pictures I can only guess. (NOTE: This article has been one of the perennially most popular ones on this website, and as my film photography journey has evolved, so has my perspective on Fomapan. Aber Rodinal mit ISO 400 geht doch, finde ich. . Although these werent excessively bad I think Ill be sticking to other films for my standard low light/push options especially HP5. je nach Charge musste mal um ne Minute variiert werden, das wars dann aber auch. I only used three cassettes of Fomapan 400 in 135 because shot outside I found it quite grainyhowever shots I made indoors under low light in a church and a museum looked really good. Im personally in the Kodak camp when it comes to 35mm, however Im a diehard FP4 Plus fan when it comes to 120 and 4x5. My negatives always look really dull. I quit shooting Fomapan 400 because it was so scratch prone for me.Also, whats your Plustek workflow like Im thinking of ditching silverfast for vuescan, Im hearing vuescan makes for more neutral images because silverfast always wants to employ negafix profiles and rubbish like that (half the films I shoot dont even have a negafix profile). Kentmere 400, exposed for the interior of the car. end of the spectrum compared to Ilford and Kodak offerings, but also because I think it performs better than its price point. Get a free Kentmere 35mm film when you use my invite link!http://i.refs.cc/r7yZ7EEe In this video I shoot my first roll of Fomapan 400 Black and White Nice and useful informations. Warum den AGFA-Rhythmus? In any case, most of my enjoyment comes from the process, not my crummy images. I wasnt expecting to prefer Fomapan overexposed, but I cant argue with the results. 5 Reasons Why You Should Try Fomapan 200. However I think there are some quite distinguished features to the grains of these films that should remain constant regardless of the technique used. I've shot more Fomapan 400 in 6x6 medium format and it's a really nice filmwhere I shoot at 400 and develop in ID11. So what does this mean to you as a photographer? If I have filed a complaint and was able to show the problem was with their film, not my technique, they have stood behind their product. Character is quite a subjective measurement, and different people will assess different qualities when discussing it. Happy shooting! Update: November 28, 2021Updated pricing references and made a few minor edits. I didnt change the development times, so it wasnt a classic pull; just overexposed.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'35mmc_com-box-3','ezslot_1',179,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0'); I think that under these conditions the film really came into its own. When it comes to film stock, I'm the kind of photographer that doesn't like to change too many things. That being said, settling on using it as a 200 means that Ill shoot it less frequently, reserving it for spring/summer use. aber eigentlich wird das nix. Its cheapReally cheap!! Find out more about 35mmc here. These days, I primarily shoot 100 Classic, in large part because I use Fomapan a great deal in the testing of vintage cameras Ive repaired or restored, and their limited shutter speeds and apertures make it difficult to properly expose on a bright, sunny day with fast ISO 400 film. I am retired and still do not have enough time to photograph, let alone experiment with different films. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. Ive experimented with Foma quite a bit to get results that I feel represent the best possible look from this film. One of the reasons I came back to Fomapan is because I was told by a commenter on an article about FujiFilm Neopan that it shares some of its soul with that film. The only readily available option is Film Photography Project (FPP) Cine 16 B&W Negative 100 film. Lastly, I converted the file to 16-bit Grayscale and added a curves layer to set the white/black points in Photoshop. Hopefully this will be apparent when you look at the images below, which you can click on to get a closer look. und das, obwohl sie weder Ahnung von Fotografie noch von Chemie hat). in Compard R09 Spezial. in Atomal49 1+2 kam er noch differentierter und mit schnen Grauwerten. I like the compositions of your sample images a lot. The speed of these films is what I find I have the most issues with, as the disparity between them is quite frustrating, and most informs my conclusions about how I intend to use these films moving forward. Der 100/21 Silvermax in Silvermax Entwickler entspricht genau dem was ich suchte. auch in D76 ist das von mir erzielte Ergebnis des Foma400 immer eher zweifelhaft gewesen. I found that Kodak TMax Developer, Acufine and Ilfotec HC all do wonderful jobs developing Fomapan 400. Consider supporting Studio C-41 Film Comparison: Kentmere 400 Vs Fomapan 400, Accidentally over exposing Lumography Lady. Bringt der APX 400 tatschlich 640 ASA bei Rodinal? Personally though, as someone who accepts, even likes grain, and isnt averse to the look that youll get out of both of these films in Rodinol I am definitely thinking that the Fomapan offering will get a few more chances to impress. Unless I pre-soak and rinse the film before the developer, I do so thoroughly after dumping-off the developer to ensure that none of the vivid green anti-halation dye remains to avoid polluting my stop both with it; with that level of rinse, the stop is probably redundant, but I do it anyway. Thank you Marius! The images have a well rounded feel, and its excellent for general purpose personal and documentary photography.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-2','ezslot_19',189,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-2-0'); The Fomapan suffers at 400, with a blockier rendering, and a foggy grey tone in the blacks which somewhat spoils the aesthetic, unless thats something youre especially looking for. Otherwise Id say its a tossup between Kodak Tri-X and Ilford HP5 Plus. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. Ich bin immer etwas unsicher welche Entwicklungszeiten ich nehmen soll, da ja nie klar ist um welche Version des Filmes es sich handelt.
Mercedes Benz Symbol Keyboard,
Massachusetts Police And Fire Scanner Frequencies,
Is Beverley Mitchell On Grey's Anatomy,
Shooting In Winona Ms Today,
Was Lyle Lovett On The Waltons,
Articles F