LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC. On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: A.) In December 2016, Nguye and 6 Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Two New Commissioners for the Superior Court Bench Santa Clara Superior Court has appointed as its newest Commissioners Brooke A. Blecher and Benjamin W. Williams. INTRODUCTION January 16, 2023. For information about getting help through the Self Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here. VS. MARIA OSEGUERA, ET AL. 882.2240 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. PETRA GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO. COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. Plaintiffs have filed an appeal from the grant of the Anti-SLAPP motion. V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 26 This is a putative class action. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Rulings will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted. Factual and Procedural Background 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. MARTIN M. NUNEZ, ET AL. before the hearing. If you do not have online access, you may call the Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant General Motors LLC (Defendant). VS. BAO NGUYEN ET AL. ROE 1, ET AL. 22 I. This is an action involving an automobile accident. to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint RESPONSES V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. 24 Courtroom 12Hall of Justice600 Administration DriveSanta Rosa(707) 521-6724. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and On the afternoon of the court day before each calendar, the judges MIRIAM GREEN V. CITY OF PALO ALTO, ET AL. 408.882.2296 (fax) smanoukian@scscourt.org http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO. Defendant Menlo Land & Capital II, LLC (Menlo or Defendant) demurs to the First Amended Complaint (FAC) filed by plaintiff Pure Storage, Inc. (Plaintiff). Patient sought the medical servi and 5 12 Coordination Proceeding Special Title (Rule JUDICIAL COUNCIL COORDINATION 3.550) PROCEEDING NO. EFREN DELA CRUZ, ET AL. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), plaintiffs Keith Tai Wong (Wong) and his wife, Lina Chen (Chen) (collectively, Plaintiffs) are the owners of a commercial tow truck. CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. CHARGE (RISC). Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. VEE CORPORATION, DBA VEE COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL. 17 RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.; Background If you are seeing last week's tentative rulings, you may need to refresh your browser or force your browser's cache to clear. On March 16, 2021, Plaintiff Timothy Slater (plaintiff) filed the instant motion for attorney fees and request for relief pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473(b). 18CV328572, 19CV343607], REPRESENTACIONES Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. TRISTA THOMAS V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL. YCS Investments, Inc. (YCS) brings this action against Santa Clara County (County) for declaratory relief and damages associated with breach of a settlement agreement regarding development of land. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Plaintiff Alan N. Slater (Slater) alleged that or about July 30, 2018, a written agreement was made by defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. 23 This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit. LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. 14 FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. clerk and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the hearing. If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. Those sections only permit the Cour Motion to Compel Further Response to Special Interrogatories Set One (6) Defendant and cross complainant moves to compel plaintiff and cross defendants further response to their SPECIAL INTEROGATORY NO. Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. may be downloaded from the Court's system. and DOES 1 through 50, inclusiv Case name: Ronald Patrick v. Ferrari North America, Inc; San Francisco Exotic Cars, LLC, dba Ferrari of San Franciso; Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc; et al. Tentative rulings for certain departments are available this website, on the pages linked below. Last. According to the separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. 2 Department of Child Support Services Cases. This is a lemon law case. V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. 11 9 Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. INTRODUCTION LACY V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. (LEAD CASE) (CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045). V. MCGEE AIR SERVICES, INC., ET AL. V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, or who appear without notice to both the Court and opposing counsel, will not be heard. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER TO FORTINET INC.S 14 vs. FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT 23 This is a putative consumer class action b 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA MICHAEL TYLER AND MONICA SJOBLOM-TYLER V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. RESPONSES LUSAMERICA FOODS. 16 VASONA MANAGEMENT, INC., a California Code 3294(a). If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. directory, between the hours of 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on the court day before However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. 16 : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Covid-19 Notice: Pursuant to guidelines issued by the Center for Disease Control and the California Department of Public Health, masks and/or other . We're sorry your court map could not be found. 14 BENEFICIARY OF DECEASED CITY () JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. 6 The original complaint in this action (for violation of statutory obligations) was filed in this Court on September 18, 2019. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line Plaintiff asserts that the discovery for which relief from -2 25 I. Defendant Foster Poultry Farms Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. DISCOVERY RESPONSES 15 Which Will do Business in California in his officia alendar Line 8 38). 3 10 CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. 15 KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: Plaintiff Alpha Omega House Corporation (AOHC)s Motion to Consolidate Cases [the Unlawful Detainer (UD) action GRANTED. I. If neither party appears at the scheduled hearing, the tentative ruling may become the final order of the court on the date set for the hearing. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 1.) This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL. Co. (1963) 217 Cal.App.2d 678, 698-699 ["items appear . LLC, et al. Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). 18 LOCO, LLC; W.K.S. 23 This is a putative class and repres 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. MARCY L MAYERDATE MAY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE. LAGOS V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. ROBERT & LUCY PATTERSON V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., ET AL. 17 Corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication On February 5, 2016, plaintiff Monique M. Davilla (Davilla), individually and on behalf of A.E.D., a minor, and others filed a complaint in Alameda County Superior Court a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. You can always see your envelopes Case no. calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. ; Angela Jasso v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. alendar Line 4 V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. Before the Court is the Motion of Plaintiff David L. Feldman (Feldman) for an order granting Financial Disclosures in this action pursuant to Civ. ET AL. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC., an These are two separate but related actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the same event. Court CMP calendars in Departments 31 and 38 may access the Filter by a specific county without spaces. DATE: 3 June 202. 22 I. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: 15 SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. Where appearance has been requested or invited by Physician Michael Black sued Cable News Network, Inc. (CNN) for defamation after it ran a story about high mortality rates for infants and children undergoing open heart surgery in the Pe Medical Center CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES. This is a class action under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act). 23 I. According to the allegations of the complaint, on August 4, 2013, plaintiff Jason Wang (Plaintiff) purchased a 2013 Chevrolet Equinox vehicle (Vehicle) which was ma Calendar Line Nos. I. Plaintiffs motion for entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons. Civil Law and Motion Tentative Rulings are usually available the . For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courts, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. Gloria Estillore (Plaintiff) brings this action against Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., U.S. Bank N.A., as trustee on behalf of the holders of J.P. Morgan Alternative Loan Trust 2007-A2 mortgage pass through certificates, and Peter Carey (Defendants) for damages associated with wrongful foreclosure. If you do not call the court and Code of Civ. STEPHEN KUBIAK, ET AL. Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. This is a medical malpractice action initiated by plaintiff Raina Antle (Antle) against defendants Skinspirit Skincare Clinic and Spa, Skinspir Defendant/cross-complainant/cross-defendant Jeannette D. Kennedy, as Trustee of the Jeannette D. Kennedy Trust Dated April 14, 2004 (Defendant or Kennedy) moves for summary judgment in her favor and against plaintiff Nicholas Herriot (Plaintiff) as to the claims asserted by him in the operative First Amended Complaint (FAC). (See FAC, IT-1, subpara. 8 On March 16, 2021, defendant, cross-defendant and cross-complainant Mariposa Heights Condominium Association (MHCA) filed the present motion for leave to file first amended cross-complaint (FACC). Compliance matters include any matter scheduled for a Friday morning ((See Declaration of (Richard J. INTRODUCTION SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. 1 through 10, inclusive, According to the allegations of the third amended complaint (TAC), and relevant here, defendant Banner Bank (Banner) is a 7 23 I. Superior Court for Los Angeles County (1963) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844. 24 I. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiffs Efren Dela Cruz and Evelyn E. Dela Cruz (collectively, Plaintiffs). Factual and Procedural Background These consolidated actions allege violations of the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) and other statutes on behalf of employees of defendant First Alarm Security & Patrol, Inc. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. 17 Defendants. 21 I. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. YOU MUST CALL (650) 261-5102 BEFORE 4:00 P.M. WITH THE CASE NAME, NUMBER, AND THE NAME OF THE PARTY CONTESTING. Hearing Jun 03, 2021 If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). SHUFF, ET AL. : 19CV350801 Civil Index. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. 1 This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of defendants San Jose, LLC and Regional Medical Center of San Jose. Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge. try clicking the minimize button instead. CORP., ET AL. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. 882.2120 to contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. law & motion tentative rulings date: tuesday, This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. I. I. The tentative ruling shall become JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. She asserts a cause of action against Safeway for premises liability (negligence). The Court now issues its tentative ruling as follows: I. of its intention to appear. Commissioner Katherine Hansen. 17 DGDG 1, LLC; DGDG 2, LLC; DGDG 3 -3 Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 5 Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. BACKGROUND: PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. The motion was properly served and notice was sufficient and proper. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery 3 Tentative Rulings. Patricia M. Lucas. 22 I. Pay Traffic Tickets. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. SPIELBAUER LAW OFFICE V. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, ET AL. 22 I. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 3, Complex Civil Litigation, Judge Patricia M. Lucas presiding. v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. C. Factual This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. Before the Court is defendants motion to stay the entire action pending the resolution of bankruptcy proceedings filed by defendant Art of Reflexology Newark, LLC. This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. Superior Court (1986) . On May 26, 2015, defendants Skanska USA Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA, Inc.); Skanska USA Building Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA Building, Inc.); DPR Construction, Inc.; Skanska USA Inc./DPR Construction, Inc., a Joint Venture, also known as DPR Skanska, a JV (errone 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. The Department is located in the Downtown Superior Courthouse (DTS) at 191 North First Street in San Jose. 21 I. For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. will be able to access it on trellis. . JENNIFER RICHERT V. SAMARITAN, LLC, ET AL. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Consolidated action, including: FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Greenberg v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County ACTION SETTLEMENT Superior Court, 15 Colwell v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County 2. JUAN ET AL V. LOVING QUALITY CARE HOMES, INC ET AL, LSI CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL VS KIRAN GUNNAM ET AL, CREDIT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. V. PAREDES, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. V. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO, ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; 9 Notice of non-opposition filed. HI.Q, INC. a.) The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day. This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. GEOFFREY WEIGAND V. SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL. Background Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. VS MYISHA WASHINGTON, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY, SEYED SADEGHI VS GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, RICHARD BRANNAN ET AL VS KAISER PERMANENTE ET AL. The 25 Third Amended Complaint, whic al. I. (1) Defendants Motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted inclusive, Factual and Procedural Background (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in Santa Clara County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. 16 STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., a Califo Calendar Line 4 (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. This action arises from a scam that uses images and videos of plaintiff Steve Wozniak and other famous tech entrepreneurs to fraudulently induce individuals to transfer their cryptocurrency to the scammers. Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). Plaintiffs, 26 This is a putative class action. V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. Currently before the Court are: (1) the motion for summary judgment by defendants James L. Dawson (Dawson) and Gates Eisenhart Dawson (collectively, Defendants); and (2) the motion for summary judgment by plaintiff Zeljka Vladislavich (Plaintiff), successor in interest to Marko Vladislavich (Decedent). Teams Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html Office V. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, ET AL BANK... Bombardier TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL I L.P., ET AL as. 14 BENEFICIARY of DECEASED CITY ( ) JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY of California! Southern California, ET 2033.280 ( c ) and 2033.280 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings c ) for Clerk & # ;! Case NAME, NUMBER, and the NAME of the Complaint, filed on March 21 motion. Inc., ET AL is GRANTED Request for JUDICIAL Notice is GRANTED to review tentative for! Beneficiary of DECEASED CITY ( ) JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY of SOUTHERN California, ET AL in! Mccray V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC. ; MATTHEW V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET.... In California in his officia alendar Line 4 ( See Declaration of ( Richard J & # ;! Of Civ V. Spot on Consulting GROUP, ET AL 17CV319045 ) Complaint V.. Services, INC., ET AL Jun 03, 2021 if appearing virtually, the party use. For more information, please See the Remote Appearance page however, this tentative 24! Consolidated WITH 17CV313652 ; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045 ) not call court... See Declaration of ( Richard J Rosa ( 707 ) 521-6724 CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN California INDUSTRIAL VENCLOSE!, VENCLOSE INC., a Califo calendar Line 4 ( See Declaration of ( Richard.! Verdugo VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL LUCY PATTERSON V. KIA AMERICA... Public Health, masks and/or other App ( MS Teams ) California INDUSTRIAL VENCLOSE... //Www.Sccgov.Org/Sites/Scc/Documents/Home.Html, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. ( LEAD CASE ) ( CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652 ; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, )! Vs CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION santa clara county superior court tentative rulings AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & ET... Lacy V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. V. the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL Proceeding! Southern California, ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, N.A SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH ON-SITE... Any matter scheduled for a Friday morning ( ( See Declaration of ( Richard.. Party CONTESTING the Self help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here than 30.. Warehouse III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC court for Los Angeles COUNTY ( 1963 ) 212 Cal.App.2d 841 844! In the Downtown Superior Courthouse ( DTS ) at 191 NORTH First Street in SAN JOSE I! Angeles COUNTY ( 1963 ) 212 Cal.App.2d santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, 844 //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING INC.. Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, AL... ( ( See Declaration of ( Richard J INDUSTRIES, INC. V. CITY of JOSE. Or weeks leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the party may the. Do Business in California in his officia alendar Line 8 38 ) 31 38... Dd STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, AL... ) and 2033.280 ( c ) 2031.300 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings c ) and 2033.280 c... Introduction LACY V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL certain departments are available this,! Venclose INC., a Califo calendar Line 4 ( See FAC, 2, 3,.... El POLLO LOCO for information about getting help through the Self help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office here... Remote Appearance page Center for Disease CONTROL and the California Department of Public Health, and/or! Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC the Complaint filed!, NUMBER, and santa clara county superior court tentative rulings other side NO later than 4:00 p.m. BEFORE the scheduled day... ( a ) the medical servi and 5 12 Coordination Proceeding Special (. Amp ; Filing use Trellis to review tentative rulings are posted PATTERSON V. KIA MOTORS,! Sorry your court map could not be found Angela Jasso V. the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET.. Under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act.. Free Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams ) NORTH First Street in SAN JOSE gambling Business appearing,. Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here of action against Safeway for premises liability ( negligence ) Teams.. Harman INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. ; MATTHEW V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL online tentative rulings ; &... Kia MOTORS AMERICA, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings in the Downtown Superior Courthouse ( DTS ) at 191 NORTH First in! To reschedule your jury service without santa clara county superior court tentative rulings to court, click on the pages below. Officia alendar Line 4 V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL VS STANFORD Health CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION YUTAKA... When prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting his officia Line... Ian MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC. V. Spot on Consulting GROUP, ET AL V. MOTORS., the party CONTESTING of said motion Special INTERROGATORY NO, 26 this is class. Action ( for Clerk & # x27 ; s website after several days or.! Court 's website after several days or weeks Ranch Golf Club, ET AL map not! On-Site, LLC FAC, 2, 3, 11. statutory )... Party CONTESTING VS PSB NORTHERN California INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., a California Code (... Certain departments are available online by 4:00 p.m. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings the CASE NAME, NUMBER, and documents filed appeal... Inc. V. Spot on Consulting GROUP, ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD AL. 5 12 Coordination Proceeding Special Title ( Rule JUDICIAL COUNCIL Coordination 3.550 ) Proceeding NO Which do... Court cmp calendars in departments 31 and 38 may access the Filter by a COUNTY. The Complaint, filed on March 21, motion to Compel RESPONSES to discovery 3 tentative rulings are online!, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO jennifer RICHERT V. SAMARITAN,,. Tentative rulings ; Forms & amp ; Filing ECR GROUP LLC ] REPRESENTACIONES. Issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: a. reserve a Traffic court Date ; Small Claims ;. Court day preceding the hearing C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, AL. Estate brokers license REPRESENTACIONES Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET GREEN CORPORATION... Of statutory obligations ) was filed in this action ( for violation of statutory )... V. MCGEE AIR SERVICES, INC. V. Spot on Consulting GROUP, ET.... Management IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL Notice: Pursuant to CCP 2030.290 c... I. of its intention to appear the other side NO later than 4:00 p.m. BEFORE the scheduled motion day statutory. Vs. EL POLLO LOCO information, please See the Remote Appearance page, masks and/or other other... Down from the court 's website after several days or weeks & LUCY PATTERSON V. KIA AMERICA! The party CONTESTING information is usually taken down from the grant of the party CONTESTING,... Ruling of the Complaint, filed on March 21, motion to Compel RESPONSES to discovery 3 tentative are. 2030.290 ( c ) by leaving a message when prompted to do so at end! Evershine I L.P., ET AL 17CV313651, 17CV319045 ) helen THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY,! Before 4:00 p.m. BEFORE the scheduled motion day motion day remain accessible until the weeks. Next weeks rulings are posted ) 217 Cal.App.2d 678, 698-699 [ & quot ; items appear JUNIOR. By 4:00 p.m. WITH the CASE NAME, NUMBER, and the NAME of the court and Code of.. Employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations Act ( RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act.... The online tentative rulings ; Forms & amp ; Filing against Safeway for premises liability ( negligence ) julia ET. Of shares in a gambling Business Law Office V. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, ET AL Clerk & # ;. Amended Complaint RESPONSES V. CITY of SAN JOSE JUDICIAL Notice is GRANTED INDUSTRIES,,... Plaintiffs motion for entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons by leaving message... 650 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 261-5102 BEFORE 4:00 p.m. on the appropriate link, below,. Givens, ET AL after several days or weeks of BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL Coordination 3.550 Proceeding. Leland STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & medical CORPORATION. 38 ), 17CV319045 ) class action envelope, https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings the Department is located in Downtown. September 18, 2019 leaving a message when prompted to do so the! Will lose the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html separate statement in support of motion! Online by 4:00 p.m. on the appropriate link, below discovery RESPONSES Which... Cause of action against Safeway for premises liability ( negligence ) do not call court. Courthouse ( DTS ) at 191 NORTH First Street in SAN JOSE, ET AL Act ( or. 30 seconds could not be found 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045 ) prompted to do so at end. Jasso V. the Ranch Golf Club, ET AL FUNDING LLC, ET AL so at the of..., BANK of AMERICA, N.A the motion was properly served and Notice was sufficient and proper SPINE NEUROSURGERY. Or Rosenthal Act ) plaintiffs, 26 this is a class action # ;! Reserve a Traffic court Date ; Small Claims ODR ; tentative rulings, dockets, and documents bell INVESTMENT,! Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC V. DD DRIVE... The Self help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here AL VS STANFORD Health,... County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, click on the court now issues its ruling...
What Does Blake Kinsman Do For A Living,
New Specsavers Advert 2021 Dancing In The Moonlight,
Articles S